@Freddy1 @Smaug @portjon @Hoggdoc. @Snoop (and @m@Robertson , but can't find a way to tag you)
Wow, thank every single one of you for taking the time to help out a beginner. I appreciate every piece of information provided. I will probably have to reread all the comments several times over.
I am still confused on which sensing would be best for our specific use: cadence vs torque; but at least I know the differences, and the trade-offs thanks to you all. (great write up m@robertson, and I wish you many years of good health!)
I can definitely see the merits of a cadence sensor. A torque sensor will still require the rider to exert some force and won't offer any sympathies in the case of exhaustion. I did have two concerns about the cadence sensor however:
1. The lack of variable speed and therefore lack of some control. And maybe I misunderstand, so please let me know if I am. You essentially adjust (do Aventon and Lectric cadence sensors allow for PAS adjustment? If not, that is another worry) the PAS to your desired speeds/cadence. Then select your level of PAS; and when pedaling, the bike will speed up to the selected cadence level. So, if the pedal assist level 1 is 6mph, you will travel a constant 6mph until you stop pedaling or change PAS level? Not that this is an issue when riding solo, nor a huge issue if riding with someone, but that second person would have to match to travel together. Just another observation; also if you want to travel between two cadence rates, that wouldn't be an option.
2. The second one has to do with:
The torque sensor, while requiring the rider to exert their own energy to move the bike, won't just kick in and speed the rider up to a marked speed. Therefore a more "natural" feel as the sensor is matching the rider's effort? I believe that the cadence sensor doesn't kick in unless you pedal, so to some extent the rider will be expecting to move, but I do worry a little about that "acceleration" to a speed even if it is slight.
With the added pace control and the lack of a motor acceleration, I might be overthinking this and obviously I'll aim to have her try both, but maybe the torque sensor might be the best option for my wife's situation? I'll have her try the Aventon Soltera, Pace 500 and the Level.2 (torque) to see what she likes best. As always, any critiques would be welcomed.
Wow, thank every single one of you for taking the time to help out a beginner. I appreciate every piece of information provided. I will probably have to reread all the comments several times over.
I am still confused on which sensing would be best for our specific use: cadence vs torque; but at least I know the differences, and the trade-offs thanks to you all. (great write up m@robertson, and I wish you many years of good health!)
I still have a lot of catching-up to do in terms of reading the thread, but something @Hoggdoc said jumped out at me. He came out in favor of cadence sensing, which is a recipe for having the local villagers rise up, tie him to a stake and light a match.
Its familiar ground for me as I agree completely: Cadence sensing, when properly tuned (which almost nobody does) can be an outstanding exercise tool, and it is by far my preferred method. Look back to that bike I pictured way back in the early part of this thread. Part of what I was doing when I bought it was seeing if my jaundiced view of torque sensing was fair (I also wanted to try out a belt drive and an IGH for the first time).
Well, torque sensing was every bit as distasteful as I thought it would be, unfortunately. I wrote the following some years ago and I don't take any of it back.
I Hate Ebike Torque-Sensing (maybe you should too)
Well, I don’t actually hate it, but it is a technology rooted in cycling’s past, whose existence was created to market a product to legacy riders.talesontwowheels.com
Torque sensing is fine if thats what you want out of your ride, but I view it as a holdover from the analog cycling era. Not necessarily 'better'. Its more familiar to new entrants. Also there are apparently cheapo cadence-based controllers that are slow to engage or merely on/off switches. I've never used one but if I did I am sure I'd be just as negative about it.
Worth mentioning is that cadence sensing is not at all the lightning rod in cargo / utility rider circles as it is for recreational riders. Riding a bike that has a job it seems makes for a different perspective.
I can definitely see the merits of a cadence sensor. A torque sensor will still require the rider to exert some force and won't offer any sympathies in the case of exhaustion. I did have two concerns about the cadence sensor however:
1. The lack of variable speed and therefore lack of some control. And maybe I misunderstand, so please let me know if I am. You essentially adjust (do Aventon and Lectric cadence sensors allow for PAS adjustment? If not, that is another worry) the PAS to your desired speeds/cadence. Then select your level of PAS; and when pedaling, the bike will speed up to the selected cadence level. So, if the pedal assist level 1 is 6mph, you will travel a constant 6mph until you stop pedaling or change PAS level? Not that this is an issue when riding solo, nor a huge issue if riding with someone, but that second person would have to match to travel together. Just another observation; also if you want to travel between two cadence rates, that wouldn't be an option.
2. The second one has to do with:
Does this also happen with the middrive?Most women will be scared when the motor kicks in; it's unexpected the first time and they don't like to get used to new things that take away any control or safety net from them.
The other arrangement is hub motor drive, which is simpler, and less expensive and a bit less intuitive; when you start to pedal, the motor accelerates you to a speed you've set by the PAS (Power Assist Setting) level in the computer.
The torque sensor, while requiring the rider to exert their own energy to move the bike, won't just kick in and speed the rider up to a marked speed. Therefore a more "natural" feel as the sensor is matching the rider's effort? I believe that the cadence sensor doesn't kick in unless you pedal, so to some extent the rider will be expecting to move, but I do worry a little about that "acceleration" to a speed even if it is slight.
With the added pace control and the lack of a motor acceleration, I might be overthinking this and obviously I'll aim to have her try both, but maybe the torque sensor might be the best option for my wife's situation? I'll have her try the Aventon Soltera, Pace 500 and the Level.2 (torque) to see what she likes best. As always, any critiques would be welcomed.